🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped millions of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for AI Training

Industry experts said the seeming data breach could boost AI companies searching for data to train their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and used questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “build their own private free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.